Sector pattern
6 trades
This is a pattern piece. It describes what we find across many engagements of this kind rather than one named project, and every figure in it is the typical case rather than a measurement of a single site. The three site assessments are the other thing: real engagements, with figures taken from the job file.
Every system was somebody's package. The places where they had to talk to each other belonged to nobody.
A mixed-use development is not one project. It is a stack of separate contracts that has to behave as one building on the day it opens. Every system belongs to somebody, and every point where one system has to make another system do something belongs to nobody, until somebody writes it down.
- Sector
- Real estate: mixed-use development
- Kind
- Sector pattern, across programmes
- Trades reached into
- 6: lift, HVAC, electrical, ironmongery, AV, fit-out
- Systems under one contract
- 6 of 6
- Written
- Before tender, not at commissioning
What a development actually is, contractually
A mixed-use development is not one project. It is a stack of separate contracts that has to behave as one building on the day it opens. Everything below follows from that, and none of it is technical.
- The developer holds the programme, not the systemsThey contract packages and expect them to arrive working together. Nothing in that structure makes anyone responsible for the joins.
- The PMC holds the programme, not the cause and effectA programme manager tracks whether a package is delivered. Whether it does the right thing when a fire alarm activates is a different document, and it is usually nobody's.
- Six trades have to be reached intoLift, HVAC, electrical, ironmongery, AV and fit-out. Each has its own contractor, its own programme and its own definition of finished, and none of them is us.
- Interfaces cost nothing before award and a great deal after itLift recall is the usual casualty. It is a line in the lift contractor's scope if it is written before tender, and a variation if it is not.
- The facility team inherits all of itThey were in the room for none of the decisions, and they will run the building for twenty years.
The interfaces that are always there
Named rather than counted. A total tells a reader nothing they can act on; this list tells them what to go and ask about on Monday.
- Fire alarm to access controlEvery controlled door on the escape route releases on alarm, and proves that it released.
- Fire alarm to liftsRecall to the designated floor, doors open, out of service. The most commonly missed interface on any development, and the one nobody discovers until the fire officer asks.
- Fire alarm to HVACDampers, shutdown and stair pressurisation. Owned by the HVAC contractor, triggered by a system that is not theirs.
- Access control to surveillanceA door forced or held open is worth nothing without the camera that saw it, and the two systems are almost always bought separately.
- Intrusion to the command roomAn alarm nobody is contracted to answer is a noise.
- Everything to the building management systemThe graphics the facility team will actually look at, and the point list that has to exist before anyone can build them.
- The public address overrideWhose message wins when two systems both want the speakers, decided in writing rather than on the day.
Why the matrix has to be written before tender
- Before tender it is a scope line, after award it is a variationThat is the whole argument, and it is commercial rather than technical. It is also the reason this conversation belongs at design stage and not at commissioning.
- Every interface needs a named owner and a defined pass criterionNot a note on a drawing. A party, and a test that either passes or does not, so that at commissioning there is nothing left to negotiate.
- Interfaces outside our package are raised at BOQ stageLift recall, damper actuation and pressurisation belong to other contractors. Named in their scopes before award, because after award they cost money nobody has budgeted.
- Commissioning tests the response, not the devicesA device test proves a device. Only the response test proves a building.
- Handover is a set of documents, not a set of keysAs-builts, the signed matrix, configuration records, test results, and an O&M written for the team who will inherit it rather than for the file.
What this is an example of
An installer delivers the devices in their package. Somebody has to own the places where those devices have to make something else happen, and on most developments nobody does, which is why the doors stay locked, the lifts keep running and the dampers stay open.
If you are running a programme where the interfaces are going to be the difficult part, that is a design-stage conversation. By commissioning it is an argument about money.
About this study. This is a sector pattern. It describes what a mixed-use development involves rather than one named programme, and it carries no count of interfaces because we have not counted one. Our three site assessments are the other kind: single engagements, with figures taken from the job file and unaltered.
On the figures
We do not name the buildings or organisations in our case studies.
The figures are from the job file and are unaltered. Names go on the client list, because a client is proud to appear there. Numbers go here, because nobody is proud to appear in a report about what was broken on their site.
This is a pattern we see repeatedly across the sector rather than a single job. The figures describe what is typical, not what was measured on one site.
If you would like to speak to a reference, we will ask them first.
Find out what your system is actually doing.
Every camera, panel, reader and sensor tested, and a signed condition report naming what has failed.
The assessment is chargeable, quoted against the site, and adjusted in full against the first year if you take cover. Where cover is not taken, the fee covers our team’s time on site and the report we leave behind, and the report is yours either way.
Chargeable, and adjusted in full if you take cover.
Book an assessment